Archive

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Make money from your market data

January 17th, 2010 Jon Knight No comments

http://www.btresourcesnewsletter.com/december09/marketData.aspx

We investigate whether consolidating market data distribution channels can reduce cost while improving market performance

When looking at reducing your market data costs through better vendor management, don’t forget to look at the underlying infrastructure.

With the majority of trades across all major markets now originating from fully-automated trading systems, and with Complex Event Processing (CEP) and Algorithmic trading applications implementing ever-more complex trading strategies, the mission criticality of low-latency, high-quality market data is increasing all the time.

As new trading venues such as dark pools and Multilateral Trading Facilities (MTFs) open to compete with exchanges, and with more and more trading taking place in emerging markets, firms are facing increasingly complex market data requirements. To fulfil this demand for data, most firms have to access a diverse portfolio of sources, ranging from direct exchange feeds and the “big two” market data providers to smaller specialist vendors. This has led to many firms signing multiple contracts and subscriptions with multiple vendors. Although this in itself is arguably good practice, it does invite inefficiency and makes accurate analysis of market data costs very difficult. Most firms have implemented some form of in-house market data management to identify cost inefficiencies within their procurement and realize savings accordingly, with varying degrees of success.

Multiple vendor networks add risk

Many market data sources tend to sell their own connectivity services for data delivery, claiming reduced latency and higher availability. This then requires the user to implement new connectivity to yet another external network. Therefore, over time, a firm’s market data infrastructure tends to become more complex as each new source is deployed.

This makes it increasingly difficult to build a holistic view of a company’s overall network infrastructure. Typically a firm’s network topology and strategy will go into great detail regarding its internal network, but will tend to be very light on detail when it comes to externals “clouds”. Lack of visibility of total infrastructure and the consequent dependencies is never good for business planning purposes.

Most market data providers delivering their data in any one country purchase their network connectivity from the same group of network vendors. Those network vendors are likely to use conventional infrastructure with the potential for common and hidden points of failure between vendors. Failure, in this context, could range from network breakdown to the less obvious problem of increased latency due to unusual patterns of network traffic. An effective way to mitigate against this risk would be to look at migrating collection and distribution of market data to a single network vendor, while still sourcing the data from a range of data sources.

Complex connectivity creates cost

Consolidating market data network connectivity can provide significant cost savings, both in terms of reduced connectivity charges and lower service costs.

Some leased lines connecting a firm’s core network to third-party networks are no longer required and can be removed, thereby reducing monthly network connection fees. Moreover the edge infrastructure of routers and switches that supported the connections can also be removed, simplifying network management, reducing rack space requirements, power and cooling costs. As a side effect of this simplification, latency may also be reduced.

Conclusion

In the current business climate, firms are firmly focused on cutting costs and reducing inefficiencies. By consolidating market data distribution with a single low-latency network provider firms can cut costs, while at the same time maintaining a well-managed portfolio of market data vendors. These changes can have the added benefit of improving the manageability of a firm’s infrastructure thereby reducing risk of failure, even improving performance.

Learn more about some of the 400 organisations that use the BT Radianz Shared Market Infrastructure to distribute financial applications and services to more than 14,000 financial industry customer locations.

We investigate whether consolidating market data distribution channels can reduce cost while improving market performance?
When looking at reducing your market data costs through better vendor management, don’t forget to look at the underlying infrastructure.
With the majority of trades across all major markets now originating from fully-automated trading systems, and with Complex Event Processing (CEP) and Algorithmic trading applications implementing ever-more complex trading strategies, the mission criticality of low-latency, high-quality market data is increasing all the time.
As new trading venues such as dark pools and Multilateral Trading Facilities (MTFs) open to compete with exchanges, and with more and more trading taking place in emerging markets, firms are facing increasingly complex market data requirements. To fulfil this demand for data, most firms have to access a diverse portfolio of sources, ranging from direct exchange feeds and the “big two” market data providers to smaller specialist vendors. This has led to many firms signing multiple contracts and subscriptions with multiple vendors. Although this in itself is arguably good practice, it does invite inefficiency and makes accurate analysis of market data costs very difficult. Most firms have implemented some form of in-house market data management to identify cost inefficiencies within their procurement and realize savings accordingly, with varying degrees of success.
Multiple vendor networks add risk
Many market data sources tend to sell their own connectivity services for data delivery, claiming reduced latency and higher availability. This then requires the user to implement new connectivity to yet another external network. Therefore, over time, a firm’s market data infrastructure tends to become more complex as each new source is deployed.
This makes it increasingly difficult to build a holistic view of a company’s overall network infrastructure. Typically a firm’s network topology and strategy will go into great detail regarding its internal network, but will tend to be very light on detail when it comes to externals “clouds”. Lack of visibility of total infrastructure and the consequent dependencies is never good for business planning purposes.
Most market data providers delivering their data in any one country purchase their network connectivity from the same group of network vendors. Those network vendors are likely to use conventional infrastructure with the potential for common and hidden points of failure between vendors. Failure, in this context, could range from network breakdown to the less obvious problem of increased latency due to unusual patterns of network traffic. An effective way to mitigate against this risk would be to look at migrating collection and distribution of market data to a single network vendor, while still sourcing the data from a range of data sources.
Complex connectivity creates cost
Consolidating market data network connectivity can provide significant cost savings, both in terms of reduced connectivity charges and lower service costs.
Some leased lines connecting a firm’s core network to third-party networks are no longer required and can be removed, thereby reducing monthly network connection fees. Moreover the edge infrastructure of routers and switches that supported the connections can also be removed, simplifying network management, reducing rack space requirements, power and cooling costs. As a side effect of this simplification, latency may also be reduced.
Conclusion
In the current business climate, firms are firmly focused on cutting costs and reducing inefficiencies. By consolidating market data distribution with a single low-latency network provider firms can cut costs, while at the same time maintaining a well-managed portfolio of market data vendors. These changes can have the added benefit of improving the manageability of a firm’s infrastructure thereby reducing risk of failure, even improving performance.
Learn more about some of the 400 organisations that use the BT Radianz Shared Market Infrastructure to distribute financial applications and services to more than 14,000 financial industry customer locations.
Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Personal Antispam ate my email

September 3rd, 2009 Jon Knight No comments

I’ve not received any emails in my inbox since I upgarded to Snow Leopard. If you ‘re upgrading your Mac and use Personal Antispam, you will find that the new version of Apple Mail will remove the Antispam plugin. However, it DOES NOT remove the rule from your Apple Mail rule set. This means that ALL of your email will be pushed into your Junk Mail filter without filtering.

To get around this problem, simply delete the relevant rule from Mail Preferences.

MacENC 7 supports Navionics charts

July 30th, 2009 Jon Knight No comments

At last, a Mac app that actually supports a mainstream chart format! The new version of MacENC (7.0) now supports Navionics Gold charts from X-traverse.com. Apparently the next versions will support Navionics cartridges as well.

MacENC 7 Navionics Portsmouth

MacENC 7 Navionics Portsmouth

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Juggle – Rethink Work, Reclaim Your Life

July 18th, 2009 Jon Knight No comments

Just read a great little book by Ian Sanders called “juggle!”. It’s a great introduction to managing different passions in your life including your job and your hobbies. Ian talks about Work Life Integration, how with modern gadgets such as the blackberry we spend most of our waking time dipping into work and it therefore makes sense to include your non-work tasks within your traditional working day. In the end, the best measure of success is the results you achieve, not the hours that you work. Recommended Reading.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Now we are two!

July 12th, 2008 Jon Knight No comments
Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Hamachi – What BackToMyMac should be..

May 25th, 2008 Jon Knight No comments

Let’s face it.. Apple’s BackToMyMac is a great idea in theory, but just doesn’t work without making specific configuration changes to your firewalls and routers, which, in a corporate environment, you’re unlikely to be able to do.

I’m sure that they’re busy working on an implementation that will actually work properly. Until they release it, I’ll be using LogMeIn’s free Hamachi tunnelling software that actually does what it says on the tin!

From LogMeIn.com..

Hamachi is a free (for limited use) service by LogMeIn.com. I’ve been using LogMeIn’s web-based remote desktop software for over a year now, and have been really impressed. It seems to have no problem dealing with whatever firewalls and routers are put in it’s way, and supports a number of different client technologies for reviewing your remote desktop including HTML. This means that you can remotely access your Mac or PC from your iPhone if you’re so inclined.

Hamachi…

Hamachi provides a secure tunnel between the different member computers on a “virtual network”, such as your home Mac and office PC for example. LogMeIn’s servers act as a co-ordination service, to affectively join the various tunnels from your various computers into the virtual network. This means that you will need to initiate a connection on each computer, but this is a fairly straightforward task.

HamachiX vs Hamachi

The official Mac release of Hamachi is command line only, and requires a fairly difficult (in Mac fluffy gui terms) installation process. However, there is a third-party Mac client called HamachiX which, as well as managing the configuration of the Hamachi service, also installs the relevant Hamachi drivers and files automatically.

However, the HamachiX client did crash on both machines on my virtual network, although the actual Hamachi tunnels continued to work fine. I presume this is because the command line process is still happily running in the background.

There is also a rather good that seems to work well. This has a smaller footprint than HamachiX so I’ll try this for day to day usage for a while.

Results

Once installed on both my Macbook Pro (in Devon) and remotely on my iMac in London (via LogMeIn Free) both computers recognised each other via Bonjour, and all of the usual MacOS network services were available, including:
Movie and audio sharing via iTunes

  • Movie and audio via iTunes
  • Screen sharing and file sharing via MacOS
  • Printing
  • Photo sharing via iPhoto

Now, the network speed is a little slow (I’m connecting over a 1Mbps/256kbps ADSL connection) but certainly useable.

Conclusion
Hamachi is a excellent. Until Apple pull their finger out of their arse and make BackToMyMac work properly, Hamachi will have a place on my essential apps list.


Office 2008.. the aftermath

January 31st, 2008 Jon Knight No comments

o I’ve finally got Office 2008 for Mac installed, but how well does it hold up under scrutiny? Well, firstly, I would say that this release is not ground-breaking in the way that Apple’s iWorks 2008 felt groundbreaking. All of the Office applications (I’ve not used Entourage a great deal) work pretty much as you’d expect them to.

However, this, in itself is the key improvement with Office 2008. Having struggled with Office for Mac 2004 running emulated under Rosetta, with all it’s stability issues, we Mac users finally have a robust and stable processor-native OS-native version of the Office suite for ourselves.

In conclusion, it’s “evolutionary, not revolutionary”, but that’s just what I needed Microsoft to deliver.

Can’t wait for MacOffice 2008

September 20th, 2007 Jon Knight 2 comments

Microsoft have published a sneak peek at some of the functionality
implemented in the totally rewritten Microsoft Office for Mac
package. I’ve been struggling with MacOffice 2004 for quite a while
now, and it is extremly sluggish under Rosetta emulation on Intel
Macs. It also has a tendency to corrupt files when accessing them on
network shares making them unusable by my Windows-wielding colleagues
(which makes neither my MacBook or myself particularly popular!) The
best solution that I’ve come up with to avoid running MacOffice 2004
is to run the Windows version of Office under VMWare Fusion. This
works very well, and, if you ignore the whole Windows boot-up time,
is actually more responsive for most text-based work than MacOffice
2004 on Intel.

Anyway, can’t wait for the new 2008 version of Office to ship! The
preview site can be accessed here.

Good review of Grib services

September 14th, 2007 Jon Knight No comments

Found a rather good site that reviews the available GRIB service. I’m
looking for tidal GRIBs for the Solent as I’m off sailing on High
Spirit all next week.

http://www.franksingleton.clara.net/navimail.html

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Posting via email…

September 11th, 2007 Jon Knight No comments

And here’s a post via email!

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: